On 2/7/2010 3:18 PM, Remy Blank wrote:
Ryan J Ollos wrote:
Should we update the TracLinks documentation page then to specify the
aliases for source? Would you also want to include `repos` in the
documentation?
I only mentioned a personal preference, not a general rule. I agree that
having the source: realm is a bit inconsistent. OTOH, it doesn't hurt
anybody, and people are free to use browser: or source: as they see fit.
So I don't see a compelling reason for deprecating either one, and
neither to add a new realm.
We *could* mention browser: in the docs, but then again, wouldn't it
only add confusion?
I think it doesn't harm to mention them as synonyms.
"repos:" is actually even a nice foresight, as in the case of multirepos
it now allows you to refer naturally to the root of a given repository ;-)
-- Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
