"source" is more descriptive since it is the noun you are linking to,
a single source file.
--Noah
On Feb 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ryan J Ollos wrote:
Hello,
I was going to open a ticket suggesting the following incosistency
with
TracLink terminology
* timeline: points to /timeline
* log: points to /log
... and so forth
Whereas,
* source: points to /browser
but would one would probably expect that:
* browser: points to /browser
I found that browser: was already implemented as a TracLink, which
is great!
Is there a reason we would not want to add this to the Trac help
page [1],
noting that browser: is an alias for source:, and suggest
deprecating the
use of source:? Or perhaps for 0.12 just mention the browser:
prefix for a
TracLink and not mention the source: prefix for a TracLink?
It seems preferable to use the browser: TracLink for the sake of
consistent
terminology since it points to the TracBrowser, and a request matching
/browser.
As far as I can tell - repos, source, and browser are aliases for
the same
TracLink [2].
[1] http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLinks
[2]
http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/browser.py?rev=9156&marks=715,717-718#L703
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Inconsistent-terminology-for-TracLinks-pointing-to-the-repository-browser-tp27485031p27485031.html
Sent from the Trac Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Trac Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
