On Tuesday 04 May 2010 4:40:34 am Christian Boos wrote: > I can understand this. Combined with the remark of Itamar that we're > actually using a "shifted" scheme, and the fact that in practice between > us it's common to talk about "version eleven", "version twelve" and more > seldom about "version zero dot eleven", I wonder if we couldn't simply > "unshift", drop the 0. prefix and directly go with the next version as > being version 12? That would at the same quiet down the concerns about > maturity that corporate users could have, yet change nothing in essence > to our actual sequence of major releases (0.10, 0.11, 12.0, 13.0, etc.).
I'd rather keep the 0.x releases going for the foreseeable future; with talk about another templating engine change and the like, a version >= 1.0 is, I think, a bit... presumptuous? misleading? erm... something. Makes _me_ a bit nervous anyway. ;) And for me, I talk about "dot ten" and "dot eleven", etc. but I'm pedantic that way. :) Eli ------------------. "If it ain't broke now, Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram [email protected] `------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
