Christian Boos wrote:
> But in the end, it's not *that* important. If we can make Trac 
> advocates' life easier by picking a release numbering scheme reflecting 
> more adequately the level of confidence we have in our product (like in, 
> using major version numbers for our major versions...), I'd personally 
> be OK to do it. If for some reasons there are resistances to change, I 
> wouldn't spend much time on this, continuing with 0.13, 0.14, etc. until 
> the day we feel it would make sense to call it 1.0 also works for me ;-)

I'm ok with either way. To me, version numbers are just that: version
numbers, and don't carry any other meaning than "we've made some
significant progress".

-- Remy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to