On 6/5/2010 1:43 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
On May 5, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Remy Blank wrote:
Christian Boos wrote:
But in the end, it's not *that* important. If we can make Trac
advocates' life easier by picking a release numbering scheme reflecting
more adequately the level of confidence we have in our product (like in,
using major version numbers for our major versions...), I'd personally
be OK to do it. If for some reasons there are resistances to change, I
wouldn't spend much time on this, continuing with 0.13, 0.14, etc. until
the day we feel it would make sense to call it 1.0 also works for me ;-)
How about just shifting by one digit? The next release after 0.12 could
be 1.3 instead of 0.13. This would avoid the psychological burden of the
1.0 release, and would be a way of saying: "Oh, we've been stable for
quite some time, actually."
Except for that whole "Do we want to change template systems again?" issue ;-)
--Noah
As a professional web-developer who's just started playing around with
Trac's code, I have to say that Genshi is one of the nicer templating
systems I've come across. There's certainly some work that could be done
in regards to the interface between Trac and Genshi (it's often not
obvious where, what or how things are being passed into the templates),
but other than that, I'd say keep it.
- Josh
-- http://www.oxideinteractive.com.au/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
