On May 5, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Remy Blank wrote: > Christian Boos wrote: >> But in the end, it's not *that* important. If we can make Trac >> advocates' life easier by picking a release numbering scheme reflecting >> more adequately the level of confidence we have in our product (like in, >> using major version numbers for our major versions...), I'd personally >> be OK to do it. If for some reasons there are resistances to change, I >> wouldn't spend much time on this, continuing with 0.13, 0.14, etc. until >> the day we feel it would make sense to call it 1.0 also works for me ;-) > > How about just shifting by one digit? The next release after 0.12 could > be 1.3 instead of 0.13. This would avoid the psychological burden of the > 1.0 release, and would be a way of saying: "Oh, we've been stable for > quite some time, actually."
Except for that whole "Do we want to change template systems again?" issue ;-) --Noah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
