Also the interwiki is very friendly for linking tools from with pages as You can look for the map of events [[with:Maptool/events|with Maptool]]. or just (in English pages) You can look for the map [[with:Maptool/events]].
2018-03-21 22:38 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy <[email protected]>: > Note: the subdomain can as well be "with.wikimedia.org", so "WikiMedia > Tools Hub" just appears in the expanded name and can be translated more > freely, with or without the plural). > "WiTH" suggests very well the cooperation and in case of problems with > "GitHub" naming, we can just keep "WiTH", and writing "Tools Hub" with the > space will be less like "GitHub" and will avoid possibly trademark issues. > > 2018-03-21 22:34 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy <[email protected]>: > >> Suppress the plural, ToolHub is OK as well, just like the abbreviation >> "WiTH" and the interwiki "with:" >> >> 2018-03-21 22:17 GMT+01:00 James Hare <[email protected]>: >> >>> I actually hadn't thought of that – I think "Toolhub" would be a great >>> idea. It's brief and translates well to a wikimedia.org subdomain name. >>> (My main issue with "ToolsHub" with the plural is that unless you use the >>> camelcase, it's very easy to read "tools hub" as "tool shub".) >>> >>> What do others think? Does Toolhub work for people? Are there other >>> ideas? >>> >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> James Hare >>> Associate Product Manager >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> https://wikimediafoundation.org >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "Tool" seems OK for me, but associating it with "Market" or "Exchange" >>>> is probably less community-related, too much business-related, and >>>> "Catalog" is effectively too passive. >>>> >>>> Why not just "ToolsHub" ? (which implies some meeting point, >>>> cooperation, communication, and does not prohibit exchanges). May be it >>>> looks for you too much like "GitHub" which shares a similar principle. >>>> Or "WiToolsHub" (WITH... not "WMTH" which is more likely "Wikimedia >>>> Thailand") if you want to abbreviate what would be the " >>>> ToolsHub.Wikimedia.org" domain ? >>>> >>>> We could then have a cute new interwiki prefix "with:" ! >>>> >>>> >>>> 2018-03-21 20:26 GMT+01:00 James Hare <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> It was recommended that I consult with this mailing list on a decision >>>>> I need to make. >>>>> >>>>> I am currently working on a catalog of tools Wikimedians use in their >>>>> work. "Tools" in this case includes web tools hosted on places such as >>>>> Toolforge, as well as bots and JavaScript gadgets. This catalog will build >>>>> on the work of Hay's tool directory: <https://tools.wmflabs.org/hay >>>>> /directory/>. >>>>> >>>>> As part of this work I have to pick what the final name of the catalog >>>>> product will be, which will include a web interface as well as an API. >>>>> "Tool Catalog" is technically an option, but I want a name that reflects >>>>> what this service intends to be, which is a living, community-maintained >>>>> documentation project. (To me, "catalog" feels too passive.) At the same >>>>> time, I want to pick a name that can be localized without difficulty. >>>>> >>>>> My first question is: do you think "tool" is something that translates >>>>> well? In English it's a very vague word, but over the past 13 or so years >>>>> it's become a term of art in the Wikimedia movement to refer to external >>>>> software tools that help you do on-wiki things. I personally think there >>>>> is >>>>> a better word out there but I don't know what would be as readily >>>>> recognizable to the community as "tools" (at least to English speakers). >>>>> The short of it is that if you'd like to see people move away from using >>>>> "tools" as a term with this meaning, now's a good time to speak up. >>>>> >>>>> My second question has to do with the next word in the name: what is >>>>> this thing we are building actually called? Assuming "tool" is okay to >>>>> use, >>>>> I personally am partial toward the names "Tool Market" or "Tool Exchange," >>>>> but it would be great to hear other ideas. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? What name do you think would work the best in the >>>>> most languages? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> James Hare >>>>> Associate Product Manager >>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>> https://wikimediafoundation.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Translators-l mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Translators-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Translators-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l
