Chaosmonk:
> It's in the "MATE System Monitor" under the "System" tab.
So it is. I never would have thought to look there. Would it be possible to
add a menu item in a more obvious place that opens the System Monitor to that
tab (and maybe a similar item in Control Panel)? Maybe under hardware? Could
also be something like the 'About Trisquel' menu item I suggested.
> Is the behavior different in Flidas?
Yes, otherwise I would not have noticed it, and therefore not commented on it
:)
> This should be fixed before release.
Awesome, great work.
I suggested in a forum thread a few years ago that the graphical Add/Remove
Programs tool needed to only offer a select list of end user apps, which are
a) graphical, and b) as user-friendly as the Add/Remove Programs tool itself.
If you are writing a custom script for selecting its content, then that would
be easier to do.
As mentioned in that older thread, I still think that CLI programs ought to
be installable only from a terminal. Would it be possible to write a script
that limits the list of programs in Synaptic to those who a GUI?
> It's possible that Transmission's minimum width is greater than half your
screen width, in which case docking wont work.
Yes, that's probably the problem. But the Transmission window doesn't *need*
to be wider than half my netbook screen (thanks to its minimal UI). How much
work would it be to tweak Transmission to allow its window to be smaller
(maybe such a fix could be contributed upstream)?
> Yes, it works and it uses Mozilla's servers.
Is the software Mozilla uses for this libre? Is there an options in the Sync
tool in Abrowser to use a self-hosted server instead of Mozilla's? If so,
then I guess this is OK.
> I proposed this as an alternative to DuckDuckGo, but quidam had concerns
about legal liability.
Why? Searx is just metasearch. It doesn't store anything locally AFAIK. What
about making a community-hosted Searx instance the default search engine?
Like search.disroot.org or https://searx.neocities.org/
> These are things quidam would have to decide to change, and he doesn't
regularly check the forum.
Fair enough, but I presume that those of you who do will pass along ideas you
see on the forum, when you think they have legs.
> Meetings begin at 16:00 UTC, which I know doesn't work for your timezone,
but the discussion typically stretches through the day until around 22:00ish
UTC.
That's 4-10am my time, literally my sleeping hours ;) Any chance of starting
every second meeting a few hours earlier, or later?
