************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
> "I haven't run this changed RI long and have not seen a big change from it." > > [What change is that? Have I missed something]
Hi Paul After watching the movie I changed the things I create while running RI from objects like apples to scenes of "wealth, health and happiness for me and everyone I contact" Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com> wrote: > You guys have really been busy while I've been gone! > > "I have been noticing that TROM processing is generally raising my tone and > making my life run smoother. I do not engage in the conflicts that I used to > stress over. I do postulate that things I need will come to me as I need them > and they do." > > [I really like hearing that. My viewpoint is that you are more into a > control of flows and they don't have to be the kind that 'must' be a cause or > 'must' be an effect everything is much more in ARC. I feel this is how one > goes from ARC into KRC. Too much emphasis is put on ... which is it ... it > better be cause ... it better not be effect. Well just don't even > characterize it in those contexts. Leave it as simple as ... it went from A > to B or from B to A or from A to Q and from B to Z. Let's not be so serious, > let's just have what it was and nothing else.] > > "I haven't run this changed RI long and have not seen a big change from it." > > [What change is that? Have I missed something?] > > "My last big cognition was from Paul's statement that winning a game causes > the negative effects of committing an overt. This shocked me and still > amazes me, that both Wining and Losing reduce a beings ability." > > [I'm really glad that communicated to you. On this same line and being on > Level 5, I realize that the silly kick yourself in the head, shoot yourself > in the foot is the idea that all of the postulates in the Postulate Failure > Chart have a 'must' in front of them. As I go thru each level, as the last > step I look at what I was running and get the idea that I don't have to have > the 'must' and neither does the pan-determined postulate. That little > exercise caps the whole thing off and puts it to bed for that session. I > wind up with full and complete determinism as does the other terminal (there > is no opposition in either direction). Not necessarily a win/win nor a > lose/lose. It's just an event, just an action, just something that happened, > no seriousness. Also no force fields or barriers or resistance.] > > "Wow, I have to be very careful to not get into any games. Before I was > operating on the notion that I could play a game and win and that would be > good. Not so a win is as bad as a loss. I must operate on the basis that I > will have what others are happy for me to have so there are no winners or > losers. > > [Ok, let's take that carefulness off altogether. Ron's definition of a win > is to decide to do something and do it, to decide not to do something and not > do it. That's all. The only other factor to apply is, 'the greatest good > for the greatest number of Dynamics'. Don't even get into the subject of > overts and motivators.] > > This is working nicely." > > Keep on TROMing > Pete > > [I've been away for a while researching, working on something I discovered > about Dennis' TROM. In doing so I also went to the T4R group and got > introduced to other techniques which I am getting a feel for. More on that > in the future.] > > [Right now let me put some simplicity into the 'winning Lottery number'. > Don't even use the word, the term, the characterization 'winning'. Using > something of the nature ... These numbers came up at the Lottery. I have the > same numbers that came up on the Lottery. This ticket has the numbers that > just came up. Notice that I'm using past tense. You can also use present > tense and future. If you use all three, see that you get them in the right > order. It would go future, present, past. Another thing to notice is the > win/lose viewpoint has been eliminated and you are not in contest with anyone > or anything. It's also not so serious or special and more on a ho-hum basis. > Do not set it up as a Postulate Failure Chart episode/event.] > > [Concerning the "Secret", I studied it when it first came out years ago and > found it interesting and very good. I also discovered that there was a > critical concept/idea, something that I can't remember what now that was left > out altogether. Can't remember what it was. It has been years.] > > Keep on TROMing, Paul, Level 5 in progress
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
