************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
I hate to be so picky, but it is EXACT OPPOSITE not exact opposition that is the keyword. If you get involved with oppose you will be tempted into cross packaging.
_____ From: Aarre Peltomaa [mailto:peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:33 PM To: Pete McLaughlin; The Resolution of Mind list Cc: Colleen K. Peltomaa Subject: Re: [TROM1] Cross Packaging Pete, The word 'exact' in 'exact oppositions' is the keyword. If the wording is even slightly off, it can't be complementary or opposing. To bear the same relationship, the wording must correlate the same way. example... 1. must know 3. must be known 2. must not know 4. must not be known correct same relationship as the above 1. must love 3. must be loved 2. must not love 4. must not be loved altered wrong relationship to the above 1. must love 3. must be lovable 2. must not love 4. must not be lovable Changing the wording from loved to lovable puts two different postulate sets (mismatched) into the same package, so that it is cross-packaged and unerasable. The word 'cross' means that the word lovable 'crossed' into this package from some other package. Loved, not lovable is the correct word in this package. Must love, and must be lovable are NOT complementary! To be willing to receive love, and to powder one's face, and wear a better dress to be more lovable isn't the same thing at all; what if she's making herself lovable for another man, and not even for yourself ! She may be making herself more lovable for some ego crap, and not willing to receive love at all ! If you tell someone that you want an apple to eat, and he say's, 'here's a nice orange for you to eat', he just invalidated what you asked for, which was an apple. I believe that salesman do that kind of bullshit quite often. Dennis mentions the importance of exact wording in many places, and I don't have the time to find them all right now. Can anyone else comment upon this ? Aarre Peltomaa On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Pete McLaughlin <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> wrote: ************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Hi Aarre Here is where Dennis states that the postulates must be as in the basic package. Sincerely Pete Cross-packaging When a junior package is not erasing cleanly the most common fault is that the package is not a true package. This is known as cross-packaging. It is one of the 'deadly' sins. When two or more junior packages are crossed up into one package neither of the packages will erase, and the whole mish-mash just grinds on forever. The therapist who tries to resolve a man's drinking problem by addressing his infantile sex life is guilty of cross-packaging. This is why the 'therapy' goes on forever with no relief for the patient. Indeed, the basic way to confuse a being is to cross-package him. Much thought has been given to this gentle art in the history of the universe, and the most confusing things that have ever happened to beings have been overt attempts to cross-package them - all under the guise of 'education', of course. Once cross-packaged the being is stuck within the crossed-up packages forever. Cross-packaging is the primary method of enslaving spiritual beings that has been used in the universe. It is infinitely more effective than the use of rubber truncheons. So make sure that the legs of your junior packages bear exactly the same relation to each other as do the legs of the basic package. Only then will they erase. Check that the complementary postulates are indeed complementary, and that the opposing postulates are exact oppositions. This can only be done empirically, on the basis of cold, hard logic. To do it any other way is to court disaster. Dennis Stephens. The Resolution of Mind (Kindle Locations 884-886). tromhelp.com. _____ From: Aarre Peltomaa <peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com> To: Pete Mclaughlin <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:20 PM Subject: Re: [TROM1] Cross Packaging? again Pete, I had them numbered incorrectly; my mistake. If 1 is must know, and 2 is must not know, and 3 is must be known, and 4 is must not be known, then one will create sensation with 1 and 4, or 2 and 3. Could you show me where Dennis states that cross-packaging is defined by whether or not the postulates are complementary or opposing? I need to see that reference. Aarre _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
