On 9 November 2016 at 21:22, Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Patches for TrouSers that support OpenSSL1.1 are welcomed!  However,
> 1) they need to be tested.

Is there a testing procedure, or are you just talking about building
it and seeing that it seems to be working?

What could I do to help?

> 2) they need to be backward-compatible.
> Since your patch doesn't work with OpenSSL1.0, would it be possible that
> if you "#ifdef" your code?

It looks like the RedHat patch attached to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388518 already supports
both OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1.

I say this because it conditionally implements this function for older OpenSSL:

[...]
+#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100001L
+static int
+RSA_set0_key(RSA *r, BIGNUM *n, BIGNUM *e, BIGNUM *d)
+{
[...]

Is this not working for you?

-- 
typedef struct me_s {
 char name[]      = { "Thomas Habets" };
 char email[]     = { "[email protected]" };
 char kernel[]    = { "Linux" };
 char *pgpKey[]   = { "http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt"; };
 char pgp[] = { "9907 8698 8A24 F52F 1C2E  87F6 39A4 9EEA 460A 0169" };
 char coolcmd[]   = { "echo '. ./_&. ./_'>_;. ./_" };
} me_t;

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
TrouSerS-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/trousers-tech

Reply via email to