Looks like trousers will be kicked out of Debian if not fixed by 2016-12-01, if I read my warning emails right.
http://bugs.debian.org/828579 On 9 November 2016 at 23:58, Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 23:09 +0000, Thomas Habets wrote: >> On 9 November 2016 at 21:22, Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Patches for TrouSers that support OpenSSL1.1 are welcomed! However, >> > 1) they need to be tested. >> >> Is there a testing procedure, or are you just talking about building >> it and seeing that it seems to be working? >> >> What could I do to help? > > Sorry, I missed telling you the testing. Normally, I would test it by > running the TrouSers test suites to make sure nothing breaks. (i.e. not > just making sure that it builds) > > > Regards, > Vicky > > >> >> > 2) they need to be backward-compatible. >> > Since your patch doesn't work with OpenSSL1.0, would it be possible that >> > if you "#ifdef" your code? >> >> It looks like the RedHat patch attached to >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388518 already supports >> both OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1. >> >> I say this because it conditionally implements this function for older >> OpenSSL: >> >> [...] >> +#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100001L >> +static int >> +RSA_set0_key(RSA *r, BIGNUM *n, BIGNUM *e, BIGNUM *d) >> +{ >> [...] >> >> Is this not working for you? >> > > -- typedef struct me_s { char name[] = { "Thomas Habets" }; char email[] = { "[email protected]" }; char kernel[] = { "Linux" }; char *pgpKey[] = { "http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt"; }; char pgp[] = { "9907 8698 8A24 F52F 1C2E 87F6 39A4 9EEA 460A 0169" }; char coolcmd[] = { "echo '. ./_&. ./_'>_;. ./_" }; } me_t; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ TrouSerS-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/trousers-tech
