[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Glenn to DAveH - You just called me a liar.
DAVEH:  Do you really think so, Glenn.  Go back and read it again.  And......I'd be curious if any other TTers understood my answer in the same way that you do.
 I told you I believe the Trinity and Godhead are the same.  You said you disagree.
DAVEH:  My disagreement should not be understood as calling you a liar, Glenn.  My comment was to explain to you that my understanding is that GODHEAD and TRINITY are two different concepts.  I believe that GODHEAD is a Biblical term used to describe the relationship of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost.  Trinity on the other hand is man's attempt to do so outside the Bible.  That is why I don't believe "Trinity and Godhead are the same".  That you believe they are the same is not a problem for me.....Believe what you will.  My disagreement was merely to explain to you that I don't see it the same way that you do.  My comment was no way of a reflection on you of being a liar.
 HOW in the world can you disagree that I believe the Godhead and Trinity are the same?
DAVEH:  I gave you a brief explanation above.  Right now I'm leaving town, so I don't have time to explain more.  But let me offer one 'problem' I have with the T doctrine:  "Substance".   Please explain to me the meaning of 'substance' as used in the T doctrine, and then I'll try to explain why I don't think the T doctrine is doctrinally correct.   (I'll do that when I get back in a few days.)
PS.  I am not offended you called me a liar.
DAVEH:  And why should you.  I didn't.
 I quite like it.
DAVEH:  Do you feel it fits you well!   ;-)
 It tells me a lot.
DAVEH:  I think you are telling all of us TTers a lot, Glenn......
>   Godhead
> > and Trinity are the same to me.

DAVEH:  I disagree.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Reply via email to