----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 9:17
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] new
revelation
Blaine did you go throught the Temple when they still had a "Protestant
Preacher" who was the minion of Satan?
Blaine: Yes--that dates me, but the answer
is yes. They seem to have changed some aspects of how the endowment is
presented, however.
A Preacher that was to represent all "Protestant Preachers" who did the
will of Satan?
Blaine: Yes, that is correct.
Maybe that has colored your reaction, so that you put your spin on
Perry's words.
Blaine: That has very little
to do with it. As I said, they have changed some aspects of the
presentation, for the simple reason that many Protestants' views have changed
over the years somewhat--they are generally no longer so fixed in their
beliefs.
If all "protestant Preachers" are puppets of Satan, as portrayed in the
Temple ceremony, then he would be a liar as you have implied. "Changing the
meaning" is lying. It is not OK
Blaine: That might be true IF I believed
what you say---I do not necessarily believe that all protestant preachers are
pupets of satan, however.
Perry simply asked for a fair representation of this man's beliefs. Perry
was not looking for a opportunity for weaseling out of the words that have
been spoken.
Seems to me it is the LDS that are constantly doing the Hokey Pokey and
having 6 different meanings and such rot. You can't ever get to the bottom of
what they believe.
Blaine: I think your are fundamentally in
error in your characterization of we Mormons on TT. I think this is so
because you need to believe these things, or your entire foundation will
crumble.
Just like the SIMPLE Yes or No questions that have NEVER been answered
here on TT!
Blaine: I have answered as
simply as possible in all instances that I am aware of. Your
interpretation of what I say seems to be the problem--you put a spin on almost
everything, then have the gaul to turn around and accuse us of doing the same
thing.
If you believe something then stand up, say it, be a man. Do not
constantly equivocate.
Blaine: This is your usual
personal attack. I won't reply to it lest I get into lowering
myself to that level.
Charles Perry Locke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Blaine:
Am I reading this as it appears, Perry--do I hear you saying
let's
>give that Baptist preacher an opportunity to change the meaning
of what he
>said?
No, you do not hear me correctly. You have
added your spin to what I wrote.
I am saying instead of hearing only ONE
side of the story, Jeff's, we should
hear from BOTH sides before
deciding what was said by whom and what it
meant. If Jeff is anything
like you, he may very well have put his own spin
on the story just like
you put your own spin on what I wrote. Think about
it!
Perry
_________________________________________________________________
Scope
out the new MSN Plus Internet Software — optimizes dial-up to the max!
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/plus&ST=1
----------
"Let
your speech be always with grace, seasoned with s! alt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this
list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be
unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try
it!
