|
I posted a lengthy (too lengthy, maybe)
re-explication of what I was trying to say previously. If after you read
that, let me know if you still do not understand anything. The problem may
be that DaveH and I have had common backgrounds, so understand easily even when
one or the other is less than explicit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:00
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Adams FALL
UPWARD
Michael D: Dave H, incidentally, Blaine made his
comments relative to posts that you, he and I were releasing to TT. He offered
a summary of the LDS position relative to my questions, and your and his
previous answers, as I recall. As you would have realized, I included the date
of the post the quotes were taken from, but did not include everything for
brevity.
I really would like Blaine to respond, though.
Blaine?????
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH: My latest comments are in
PINK.......
michael douglas wrote:
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Blainer:. But he was denied the
privilege of tabernacling in the flesh,
because he made war in heaven, and actually overcame one-third of
the
hosts of heaven. The other two-thirds are
you and I
(here Blainer is saying that he is an
angel/former angel) and all
others who were allowed to
take on mortal bodies. 17/10/2002 - Michael D to
Dave H: Blainer represents this as though
the other two thirds have already taken on flesh.
DAVEH: He didn't quite say that, but
the effect is the same. (IOW.....some of those two thirds may
yet to be born.)
Michael D: I understand that that is what he is
saying now. My point is that in our previous discussions, he was
saying something very different.
DAVEH: It's hard for me to
comment on his private discussions with you, Michael.
Michael D: Of course, as
stated above they weren't really private...
His statements to Perry
stopped me in my tracks, so I had to go back and compare them with
what he said back then. Clearly they are contradictions and probably
adjusted views.
DAVEH: If you think Blaine is
making contradictory statements, then why did you ask me about it?
They didn't seem contradictory to me, hearing only half the
conversation. Seems to me you should be asking Blaine instead of me,
Michael....
Michael D: Actually, I thought that is what
I did. I think you actually responded to the question I asked in Oct,
2002. I really was only quoting it, not asking it now. I don't mind you
making an input now, though.
BT Yahoo! Broadband - Free
modem offer, sign
up online today and save £80
|
