Well folks I went to the movie and saw parts of it; it was much more
disturbing than I had anticipated so I averted my eyes from a lot of it
as
did one of our daughters. It was violence from start to finish,
the soundtrack
one of punching, slapping, and whipping and the atmosphere decidedly
RC.
The costuming reminded me of a monastery - either black or monk like
brown.
I had hoped that with all the expert help it would be more like a living
Bible
Dictionary with history and authentic lifestyle portrayed, preparing
for the
Passover etc. but this wasn't the focus. More and longer flashbacks
would
have helped considerably. My husband thought so too.
As for accuracy, the scripture was wrested from the start when
only the
first part of Isa 53:5 showed on the screen: "He was wounded for
our
transgressions he was bruised for our iniquity" after which the
flesh fest
was on and an important point lost which is that the crucifixion was
not only
a physical sacrifice; he was a guilt/sin offering. Isa 53:10
says that God
made his SOUL an offering for sin. This is how "the
chastisement of our
peace was upon Him and with His stripes we are healed"
I found it difficult to believe the Roman soldiers could have
acted in the
way they were portrayed which was totally chaotic and out of order,
drinking
on the job, laughing, and whipping him all the way up this steep hill to
Golgotha
with him bloody, staggering, and constantly falling; it was plainly
sadistic and
must have been part of the mystic nuns vision because Rome would
never
have conquered most of the known world acting like this, surely there
were
some protocols - They completely left out the one Roman soldier
at the foot
of the cross who said "Surely this is the son of God"
The screening we attended was put on by an Assembly of God Church
who were using it for evangelism. They had pkts of kleenex on every
seat
and they gave out pens and response cards, they wanted reactions.
IMO
Mel Gibson should have left well enough alone and so should the
Church
leaders... because this portrays a whole religious scenario that is
another
reality. Noone in our generation was present and IMO the visions of
the
mystic nuns are from another spirit; they have Mary saying "This
is flesh
of my flesh" and Jesus calling himself the "Son of the
handmaiden". Why
not let it be finished. We no longer know Jesus after the
flesh. Last I
heard the movie had already made $200,000.00 - so Mr. Gibson
has his reward.
Let God be God and every man a liar....
Grace and Peace,
Judy
|
- [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Chr... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the... Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of... Wm. Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of... Terry Clifton