I may not measure up to your
standards Jonathan but I am what I am by the grace of God and if I am naive,
then that's how it is at least for now. I am not holding anything over
anybody. This is a public list and all of you are free to
contribute/share your own light. I have challenged and questioned but this
should not cause strife. As for my tone, are you sure you are not reading
into my words things I am not saying?
I can't help but wonder why you
and Bill are so terribly sensitive. If what you believe and are
holding to is truth, it will stand. If it's not then I'm doing you a
service. DaveH has been through the wringer much worse than
anything you or Bill have had thrown at you on TT and he seems to
have taken it all in good humor. You and Bill say you are
believers, DaveH is Mormon... now this is something to ponder.
jt
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy,
Although you are
neither stumbled nor offended you are entirely naive. It is shocking how
you attempt to wrestle away any responsibility for your posts, for your tone,
for the strife you have caused. At some point in your life you may need to
take seriously what others think about you; to really wrestle with how you come
across. Holding your doctrines, your ‘light of God’s Word’ over top of
people is not right. People are more important; Bill is more
important.
Jonathan
Bill, appears to have made his decision to depart which is sad because once again he has judged my motives which is something only God is capable of doing with any accuracy.
I find the questions below to be valid ones and each time I challenge Bill I do so hoping that he will be able to "give an answer for the hope that is in him (1 Peter 3:15)" but he usually become angry and defensive turning honest questions into accusation which tells me that all of this talk about "fellowship, giving, sharing, participation, communion, and community - is just that, talk" It will take more than a seductive doctrine to bring it to pass. I've not understood things Bill has said many times before in the light of God's Word. If Bill would be less emotional and more willing to dialogue it could work. At this point I am neither stumbled nor offended.
Grace and Peace, Judy
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peace to you, Judy. You do not read for understanding. If you did, you would understand what I say below by the things I have said many times before. Nope, yours is a different ambition. You read only to find something you can use to stir up strife. Well, guess what? Peace to you. I'm not biting. Bill
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] (no subject) Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] (no subject) Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Jonathan Hughes
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Jonathan Hughes
- Re: [TruthTalk] (no subject) Terry Clifton
- [TruthTalk] (no subject) Judy Taylor