Judy, I am a little surprised at your bias.
It is, in fact, the only
thing you have going for you in this discussion in this particular
post. Check it out .....
jt: I wouldn't call it MY
bias John. I didn't write the Bible.
John: ... exegete is exegete. Paul uses "law" in this text 10
times. Eight times he omits the definite article "the" and
twice he includes it. The point of the passage is that "salvation" is possible for one who has not heard anything
about law or The Law. To argue
that this Gentile is knowingly subject to the "perfect law of liberty" is
to make the passage pointless.
jt:
To put your meaning into this text one would need to negate or change a
lot of other passages. This means there is "another" way to be saved. Some
must be born again, die to the old flesh nature, and walk in the
perfect law of liberty; where others can just be "good folk" and nice
neighbors. I don't see this concept anywhere else in the entire
Bible - do you John?
John: Pointless? This exegetical obervation is
pointless? The general application of
"law" verses the specfic application is
point less -- not to me. This is an observation about
the written Word of God. At last look, you and I consider the
written word to be of great importance.
jt: I'm not aware of this
differentiation.
John ....?of Christ does BY NATURE what is required in God's
law,
Obviously, this is not true. But you reject the very
scripture that gives us this broader point of view. And
God's law is conviction, love and Spirit. That is what the
biblical message says. What you are doing is putting one scripture against
another instead of allowing one to add to you understanding of
another. No good.
jt: Jesus didn't come to patch up the
old. He came to introduce something entirely new.
John: Let me put this observation into context. In the Roman
letter, especially the first 7 chapters, Paul is saying over and over
again that man is a sinner and God saves him in spite of himself.
jt: Not without his knowledge and consent.
God does not sneak in the back way, nor does he manipulate or coerce; this
man (like the rest of us) is a sinner who has come to Christ, partaken of
the divine nature, and who is in the process of "being saved" .. This
is the only way he could be doing by NATURE what is in God's
law.
John: The Gentile in Romans 2:12-16 has an
avenue of justification available to him -- doing by nature
the things of law.
jt: This is an
impossibility for an unregenerate soul who is outside the Covenants
of grace and is by nature a "child of wrath" (Ephesians 2:3). The
law Paul refers to here is God's Law.
John: Impossible? All things are possible --
especially when scripture says so. And Rom 2:12-16 clear makes that
statement.
jt: I believe you are reading into the text
meaning that is not there. God is not doubleminded and He will not
violate His own Word - actually it is impossible for Him to
lie. It would be nice to think that everyone makes it, that God
would lower his standard for some but this is living in religious
fantasy. It is not reality. God has set the standard and it is
the "royal law" Incidentally this law is the same as the Old
Covenant law. If you compare the Sermon on the Mount with the Ten
Commandments given to Moses on Mt. Sinai you will find that Moses was
given the letter and we have the Spirit of the same law.
John: In a practical sense, most will fail in this regard, or at
least a good number of individuals will fail. On the day of
judgment, this man has no excuse. He cannot say, "But no one
told me about Christ." In certain parts of the world, today, he
could say this. God will only point to his personal choices
and hold him accountable for his actions through Christ.
jt: There is no excuse anyway John Romans 1:21,22
strips away that delusion. If they choose to seek Him God will make sure
someone comes to them with the truth as he did with Cornelius in the book
of Acts. If not He will CAUSE them to believe the lie because they
refused to love the truth. (2 Thess 2:11)
John: None of this logic counters Ro 2:12-16. Why not
allow this text to amend your belief?
jt: Romans 2:12-16 in balance and context is
Paul writing to the Church at Rome whose faith has been spoken of
over the entire world and who he says has like faith with him.
Why do you make it so difficult to accept that the gentile in this
text is born again and part of the New Creation in Christ; A gentile
who does by nature the things that are in the law because he's
been made a "partaker of the divine nature?".
John: In Christ, my sins, my inactivity, my failure is
covered. This Gentile stands before God on judgment day with
nothing available to him but the state of affairs of his
heart.
jt: Better make sure they are right. All
judgment in heaven and on earth has been given to the Son and we have a
picture of this in the gospels. Many will come to Him and say "Lord, Lord,
didn't I do this and that - and he will reply "I never did know you"
depart from me.... He is the one who determines who is one of His sheep
and who is a goat. His sheep are the ones who hear His Voice... they
don't follow the other voices. Please don't be carried away with these
doctrines John.... Only the Truth makes us free.
John: So the guy who has never heard the gospel is lost?
I do not pretend to establish my belief with this question BUT, it is a
consideration.
jt: Yes. This is what the scriptures teach
"But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost; in whom the
god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest
the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God should
shine unto them (2 Cor 4:3,4).
John: I am saying that the truth of this
passage presents the Gentile having not heard the
"law" with no excuse. It is not that he will say "I
have done this and that." Rather, God will say to him (assuming he is lost) "Judy and John and Jonathan and
BillT and Lance and, well, the larger community of believers I see as an
extension of who I am, they failed you -- they did not get to you with the
preaching of the gospel, but, my firend, you did not rise to any level of
kindness or consideration of others. You lived for and unto
yourself -- never practicing the kindness that you saw in some who
lived in your world. You are without excuse. See ya."
jt: Look at the text again John. Jesus didn't say
"you didn't practice kindness or "You lived for yourself". Jesus said
they practiced "lawlessness" and SIN is lawlessness according to 1 John
3:4. This is why IMO it is so important to know what sin is and what
sin is not so that we too can "go and sin no more"
judyt
John