JOHN IN CAPS
David Miller wrote: >> John, do you reconcile these passages together in your mind, >> or do you just dismiss Romans 9:13 because you like reading >> John 3:16 better? John wrote: > When I get back to my library, I will deal with this issue. I will > not answer the question posed above, however, because it implies > a shallowness on my part that I do not care to debate. I am encouraged to find you expressing yourself more directly, I WRITE NO DIFFERENTLY NOW THAN BEFORE. NO ONE ON THIS FORUM HAS PROBLEMS UNDERSTANDING ME EXCEPT YOU. but please try to understand that I speak frankly too. In other words, when I ask a question like I did before, there are no hidden motives or implications of "shallowness on your part." I mean what I say. I am sincerely asking you if you reconcile these passages, or just dismiss one over the other? THEN ASK IT THAT WAY. THE OTHER WAS AN INSULT WHETHER YOU AGREE OR NOT. HOPEFULLY I AM MAKING MYSELF CLEAR. I AM NOT A TENDERHEARTED WOUNDED AT EVERY INDIVIDUAL TURN OR SNIDE REMARK. BUT I CERTIANLY KNOW WHEN I AM BEING DEALT WITH IN NEGATIVES TERMS. SHALL WE MOVE ON? The answer to this question does not require a library. I am asking you to explain a basic way that you approach Scripture. My assumption is that no passage contradicts another. Apparent contradictions are paradoxes, that when examined closely, lead to greater understanding. If one passage says that God loves the whole world so much that he sacrificed his Son for them, and other passages say that God hates the wicked and will cast them into everlasting damnation, then these apparent contradictions need to be reconciled. One possibility is that at one time, God loved them and gave them the ultimate sacrifice, but then after his great gesture of love was spurned and trampled on, he became angry toward them and hated them, and will continue to hate them eternally. Do you approach Scripture in the same way that I do, believing that no one passage contradicts another, or do you have a different model that you work from? APPARENTLY YOU HAVEN'T READ MUCH OF ANYTHING I HAVE WRITTEN OVER THE PAST YEAR AND HALF (?) YES, DAVID, I BELIEVE THE ONLY PRAGMATIC AND BENEFICIAL METHOD OF BIBLE STUDY INCLUDES A WILLINGNESS ON THE PART OF THE STUDENT TO RECONCILE ALL APPRAENT CONTRADICTIONS. WHERE I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE CAN "PROVE" VERBAL AND PLENARY INSPIRATION - I INCLUDE SUCH A NOTION IN MY THINKING - SUCH A NOTION FUNCTIONS IN THE SAME MANNER AS A MATHMATICAL POSTULATE. i DO NOT MAKE IT A TEST OF CONTINUED FELLOWSHIP, HOWEVER. jOHN Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
