Sorry, that is what you said. Where's the corner?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: November 18, 2004 11:58
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?

Isn’t that what I just said below??? (Are you hard of hearing?) The point is this: you use this as a reason to write-off my objections to Kruger.  It’s a perfect scapegoat.  Why don’t you use it as a reason that you like Kruger instead? Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?

 

Do you have a 'time out' corner? Go, sit in it then, come back (15 min will do) WE ALL...I SAID ALL...HAVE BIASES..PLEASE TELL ME THAT YOU KNOW THAT?

----- Original Message -----

Sent: November 18, 2004 09:57

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?

 

So my understanding of God, which has been developed over the past 35 years, is “bias”—of which you and yours have none? Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?

 

There was and, you failed. Seriously though, I believe you may have approached the opportunity with a bias. Possible?

----- Original Message -----

Sent: November 18, 2004 09:41

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?

 

As to your second observation, you would be correct.Now, as to THAT OBSERVATION, I wish to add the following: It may be that none of 'us' has adequately represented the theology within. Please, do not be dismissive of that which you may not yourself adequately apprehend. Already one person on TT (Izzy) did so based on her 'reading' of one book (The Great Dance). Another (David Miller) 'read' The Mediation of Christ. I have yet to see that either of them understood what it was they chose to dismiss.

 

Is there going to be a test, or what??? Iz

 

Reply via email to