----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin


> Bill Taylor wrote:
> > Young children are included in Christ's recapitulation
> > of humanity and remain so until they refuse him and
> > therefore that justification of life.
>
> One argument that Paul makes for the continuing condemnation is the
> observation of death.  I don't see any change after Christ's death,
burial,
> and resurrection in regards to humans being born into death.  Those who
are
> born appear to continue to be born into death in the same way that they
did
> prior to Christ's incarnation.  Do you see it differently?

Yes, as long as God is patient, not willing that any should perish but come
to repentance, humans will continue to die for the same reason that Adam
died after he sinned: they will remain removed from the tree of life, lest
they eat of it and live forever under the conditions of the fall. (See below
for more comments on this)

>
> Bill Taylor wrote:
> > Hence I wrote: they are saved, whereupon
> > Izzy disagreed, arguing instead that they don't
> > need to be saved because they have not sinned.
> > If I remember you correctly, I think you take a
> > similar position.
>
> No, I'm not comfortable with the idea that infants do not need to be saved
> because they have not sinned.  I admit that I have trouble seeing how
guilt
> would be imputed to someone who has not sinned (Ezek. 18 supports this
> view), but it seems to me that they are still born into death and are in a
> state that is separated from God.  There are questions about all of this
> that I am still trying to work out in my mind.  The Augustinian tradition
> seems to delineate two different kinds of guilt.  I suppose I tend toward
> that perspective.  There also appears to be different kinds of
condemnation,
> the condemnation that comes from the sin of those in authority over us
> (hence, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the
> third and fourth geneartion) versus the condemnation for sin committed in
> ignorance versus the condemnation for sin committed wilfully and
> obstinately.
>
> If I am hearing you right, I think you do not perceive any condemnation
due
> to those who commit sins in ignorance.  If I am hearing you wrong on this,
> please clarify.  Thanks.

I do very much think that every Christian today needs to be very diligent in
thinking themselves through the influence of Augustine on their
anthropolical interpretions. He has had a collosal impact on our thinking in
this area. Perhaps when they have done that, they will continue to agree
with him, which is their perogative. My suspision, however, is that most are
unaware of his ifluence on their theological perspectives and will want to
adjust their thinking, once they have worked themselves through his
theology, and realized the influence of Manichaesm on his thought processes.

To be truthful with you, David, I have not thought about this in the terms
you are drawing to my attention. I will want to look into the meaning of
"condemnation" in the context it is used here. If that condemnation is as I
stated above, i.e., an effect from the initial removal of A&W from the tree
of life, I believe children do suffer that condemnation with all humanity.
Jesus himself was born under the judgment of that condemnation -- I think,
hmmmmm. I also think that all humans are born with a propensity toward sin,
Jesus included, which is another result of Adam's offence. But in his
victorious resurrection Christ became the merciful justification of ALL life
(which is why God in his forebearance did not "impute" their trespasses to
them), including life after death, which will be granted to deceased
children via their inclusion in him. Anyway, if you don't mind I would like
to look into this a bit further before being any more specific.

Bill
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to