You guys are just pretending (for fun) not to know that the word is "aspersions", right?
 
Debbie
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dispersions

DAVEH:  Hmmmmmm.......Now that I think about it, perhaps you are my mental problem!   ;-)

    Still waiting for you to define dispersions, Kevin.   If you want to make an accusation about me, it would be nice to know the definition of that accusation.  Don't you think you should withdraw the accusation if you aren't able to offer a pertinent definition???

Kevin Deegan wrote:
Do you have a mental problem?
Notice I did not accuse you of such i am just asking!

Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH:  None of your points below meet the qualification of disperse, Kevin.   I asked you to define dispersions, and you failed to do so, since you did not post the requested definition.  So again Kevin......Look up the definition of dispersion, and then let me know again how I've dispersed Perry.

    BTW.....I would be curious to know if Perry agrees with you on this, Kevin........Perry, do you feel I have been casting dispersions on you???

    Now Kevin.....Let me ask if you are possibly bearing false witness.  Did I claim Perry was angry, or did I ask him if he was angry?  Do you recognize the difference?

    Now look at all the other points you've made.   Have I accused him of the things you've said, or did I ASK him i f he exhibited those characteristics?  Go back and read them carefully Kevin, and I think you will find that you are assuming something that is not true in the way I communicated with Perry.   When I suggested he was attacking Mormonism, he even agreed in a backhanded way (see his last comment below).  So what's the problem, Kevin.....got a burr under your saddle???

    As for your comment about me being anti-Christian, or anti-Bible....I think you'll find I believe the Bible more literally than you.   Furthermore, I'd like to think my behavior contrasts any anti-Christian implications you may want to lay on my shoulders.

    To change the subject slightly, how about you, Kevin?  Do you view yourself as an anti-Mormon?  And, do you get angry when discussing these things with me?  And finally....Do you feel I am casting dispersions on you by asking you those questions???


Kevin Deegan wrote:
give me one example where I've dispersed him
 
You claim he is ANGRY, an ANTI, he is ATTACKING, with Internal HANG UPS
DAVEH: Do you feel compelled to attack other religions as you do the LDS Church?
DAVEH: Referring to you as an anti-Mormon would have no political or social consequences on TT. I think the description fits you well, and see no reason why you should not be
comfortable wearing it.
DAVEH: Is there a possibility the reason you are repulsed is an internal hang-up rather than with what I actually post?
DAVEH: Did you awake having a knot in your stomach and feeling angry?
I count the number, as four here.
You try to discredit by labeling him.
By the way are you ANTI Christian? Anti Bible?

Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH:  Casting dispersions against Perry?  Don't think so, Kevin.  I'm just helping Perry understand how he comes across to me.  If you think I've cast a single dispersion against Perry, please define dispersion and then give me one example where I've dispersed him....so to speak.

    As for proving Mormonism true.....I've never attempted to do that on TT.

Kevin Deegan wrote:
DaveH If you want to discuss Theology why do you cast all these dispersions against Perry character?
Even if he was a ANGRY, ANTI, ATTACKING, with Internal HANG UPS, type person as you paint the picture, what exactly about that picture, proves Mormonism true?


Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave,

>>It is not what we have in common that is the problem...it is what we do
>>NOT have in common.

>DAVEH: So you have no interest in discussing theology in an effort to see
>what we might believe in common?

Cpl: Not Really. I have an interest in exposing the error called mormonism.

>DAVEH: To you, TT merely is a place to convert people to your way of
>thinking. Am I reading you wrong on this? If not, then for what reason
>did you come to TT, Perry?

Cpl: I am here to convert no one. My original purpose was different than it
is now. My purpose now seems to be to expose satanically inspired heresy of
the mormons. At least that is the direction in which I am being drawn.

>DAVEH: ??? politacally charged framework??? Referring to you as an
>anti-Mormon would have no poli tical o r social consequences on TT. I think
>the description fits you well, and see no reason why you should not be
>comfortable wearing it.

Cpl: These days the term “anti-whatever” is used by sinners to discredit
those who disagree with their behavior and beliefs. If that is your best
defense against my claims, then call me what you like.

>DAVEH: Do you feel compelled to attack other religions as you do the LDS
>Church? IOW....If there was a Catholic TTer, would you treat them the same
>way you treat Mormons?

Not the same, but I would engage them. They are a Christian church with
errors…the mormons are a satanically inspired heretical group in total
error.

>>I can only tell what I know and believe.

>DAVEH: That's where I see you might have a problem, Perry. You seem more
>intent on attacking rather than sharing your beliefs.

Cpl: If you feel the truth as an attack, maybe it is your fait h that has a
problem.

>DAVEH: Is there a possibility the reason you are repulsed is an internal
>hang-up rather than with what I actually post?

Cpl: If my internal hang-up is that I am repulsed by Satan, the praise God.
I have the gift of discernment!

>DAVEH: Now....knowing how repulsed you are at the beliefs I espouse, would
>you advocate I not post my beliefs on TT?

Cpl: Never. But, since the forum is called "truth-talk", posting deceptions
here does seem strange.

>DAVEH: In times past, some other TTers felt it was wrong for me to even be
>a member of TT. Do you feel that way as well? IF you feel it is OK for me
>to be a TTer, do you think it is OK to post my beliefs here as freely as
>you or any other TTers?

Cpl: No. Sure.

>DAVEH: Did you awake having a knot in your stomach and feeling angry? No
>offense Perry, but that's the way you come across many times.

C pl: No. I am not angry. I am repulsed.

>>I recoil at the presence of Satan

>DAVEH: ??? Meaning me? :-(

Cpl: You are not the center of our discussion, Dave. Satan and his mormon
church are.

>DAVEH: Do you feel I am bringing evil to TT? If so, (other than Blaine)
>have you felt that way about other TTers as well?

Cpl: You are merely deceived and bringing this deception into the forum.

>DAVEH: Or, Perry....is it not possible the Lord may want you to know more
>about what I believe rather than for me to hear what you believe?

Cpl: That is possible, but if so, it is probably not for the reasons you
think it is.

>DAVEH: Perhaps so.....From what I experience in TT, I certainly have much
>more appreciation for my LDS culture than I had before.

Cpl: I can understand why Satan would tighten his grip on you when he is
attacked.

Perry


-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to