I am curious, Deegan.   This is a discussion group.   With reference to your comments below, what should be allowed and discussed without resulting insult?  What is intellectual fair game to you? 
 
Jd 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha

We get the gist of it and we don't like it.
Your words are your private doctrine.
I prefer the Word of God

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't even try to understand what I am saying. 
 
Let's move on, shall we. 
 
Jd 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha

We don't start all over again from the beginning JD; if we don't hold fast to what we already know and
understand as truth then we are in danger of slipping ie: "Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed (attention) to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip."  Since Jesus is the
"same yesterday, today, and forever" Truth is not relevant to culture or changing times.  In fact when all else
is in flux - HE remains the same.  jt 
 
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 08:44:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has occurred to me that if we speak and write with the view in mind that we at the beginning of another day of learning,  our hearts and minds will be more open to what God has instore.  Perhaps our doctrinal statements should not be "as if written n stone.'   But reflective of the growth that will begin again with the start of a new day. 
 
We would do less fighting and more growing. 
 
That is what I Cor 8:1-3 is saying,   ----   is it not?  Paul is surely NOT against knowing but knowing that is final, a closed systems of knowledge.  
 
Jd
 

Discover Yahoo!
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!

Reply via email to