JD once more you have managed to cut and past so that
this thread appears to be saying
something other than what I did say. Let me
put it another way -
I noted that Izzy did very well with Bill by using questions until they reached an impasse
and Bill did
not become offended - neither did he take
his ball and go home but the final outcome was the
same.
Possibly Izzy has more grace in this area than I
do but what comes naturally for her would
be forced
and manipulative from me - what's more I would be
violating my own
conscience. We each have
different gifts and I don't see the need
to apologize for who I am in the Lord, for
just being me. My
conscience is clear and I figure it is just as
easy for you and others to resist the accuser and believe
the best of me rather than that I am deliberately being mean and nasty. judyt
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:23:01 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A scary admission that needs correcting AND the continued patient forgiveness of the Lord.I am saying that if you cannot agree, consider that they are being sincere even if they are inerror, and with that in mind, very politely ask questions that will help them understand betteras well as help you understand them better.I don't know how to do that TerryA redundant question needing no reply at all. Every member of TT knows the answer.Let's get real here Terry ... Satan comes as an angel of light - so are you saying that it's OK to dispensespiritual poison so long as one is nice, polite, and dosen't offend anyone? That is how all cults begin....