On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:36, you wrote: > Right now, what Turbine needs is documentation, not new features. If > anyone has attempted to extend the turbine schema in any way, or use Intake > for that matter. They quickly realize that it can be an exercise in > frustration, admittedly offset somewhat by the elation you feel when you > finally figure out (after days of searching) what could have been > documented in a couple of hours.
Hi Mitch and others, Many of the Turbine developers are currently busy on other projects at the moment. So, if anyone out there wants the the Turbine documentation improved in any way, the best way is to submit changes/additions to the turbine-dev mailing list. Patches are always welcome :) Alternatively, you can raise issues with the Turbine documentation in Scarab: http://nagoya.apache.org/scarab/issues If anyone out there is a new Turbine user, it would be really helpful for the Turbine community if you would document Turbine as you learn about it. Any contributions, no matter how small, are always appreciated. Thanks, -- Rodney -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
