I suspect we are using Anakia for generation of the Turbine site.  If so,
any documentation must be formatted in XML, per the Anakia requirements.
Can someone validate this?

What is mechanism for submission?  If I write what I believe to be a
beneficial howto, who decides that it has applicability, and incorporates it
into the Anakia tree and regenerates the site?

Could it be that lack of a formal process in the reason there is
insufficient/outdated documentation?

-Mitch

-----Original Message-----
From: Quinton McCombs [mailto:qmccombs@;nequalsone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:30 AM
To: Turbine Users List
Subject: Re: Documentation (was: Re: Thanks)


Another idea for documentation could be something similar to the Linux
Documentation Project.  This would allow documents of varying scope.
For example a very small how-to could be on transactions.

A much larger how-to could be on intake or extending the turbine schema.


On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 18:37, Scott Eade wrote:

> Great.  For new documents we should aim for at least an outline before
we
> add them as works in progress.  If you intend working on these through
to a
> level of semi-completion then you should look at the existing xdocs
and use
> that format (it is really very easy).
>
> I can't recall where the xdoc documentation resides, bit it is fairly
easy
> to follow an example - e.g.:
>
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-turbine-2/xdocs/howto/extend-user-
howt
> o.xml?rev=1.7&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
>
> Cheers,
>
> Scott

>Quinton McCombs<
Strategic Planner, NEqualsOne
 1800 International Park Drive
 Suite 205
 Birmingham, AL 35243
p: 205.324.8005 x121  800.466.1337
 f: 205.324.7008
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.NEqualsOne.com



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to