On 11/09/2010 10:00 PM, Mark Ramm wrote: > > Personally I'm still leaning toward the 3 way merger of BFG/ > Pyrmaid, Pylons and TG, with the 2 package concept Mark mentioned > (minimal-core vs full-stack). > > > I've heard a lot of that in this thread. Sure there's been some > feedback in other directions, but here and offline I'd say the > majority of people are in favor of some kind of merger. And I think > that the momentum that Pyramid has been gaining over the last few days > since it's public announcement has been a very good thing. If the merger happens, my nominee for the new name for TurboGears 3 is "TurboPyramid." That way:
* there will be "Pyramid" as the base, and "TurboPyramid" as its more full-featured partner, and the distinction is expressed in the name, * this will also retain the essentials of each brands' name, and * express that TurboGears is now based on Pyramid. I suppose during TurboGears 2's development it would not have been good to move from "TurboGears" to "TurboPylons" (and now on to "TurboPyramid," needlessly multiplying names), because though Pylons and TurboGears were cooperating at that point, they were not actually merged into one. But now if they do merge, it might be best to bring both the minimal-core & full-stack names within the same general brand umbrella in this kind of fashion. Tim Black -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
