On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not referencing this class directly in my code.  Can it be that the
> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or
> not
> the latest??  I can not think of other possibilities.
>
> Vamsi
>
>
> On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
> > > > LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us
> feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Please follow the instructions at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/README.TXT
> > > > .
> > > > The demo scenario is captured at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/scenario.png
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > The demo is built on top of the sandbox code in Geronimo [2] which
> is
> > > > discussed on [3].
> > > >
> > > > Please note this is just the starting of effort and there are still
> > > quite
> > > > a
> > > > lot to do. Please join us on this effort.
> > > >
> > > > In the near term, I believe that we need to do the following:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Move the code out of sandbox and have them in the build with test
> > > > cases.
> > > > 2) The tuscany-geronimo-plugin uses mixed versions of Tuscany Java
> SCA
> > > > 0.91-incubating and 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. Let's try to switch to
> > > > 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT so that we have consistent modules.
> > >
> > >
> > > After switching to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, I have run into a
> > > NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory.
> > >
> > >
> > > 3) The Geronimo 2.0 RC1 is not being voted on. We should be prepared
> to
> > > move
> > > > this level. Vamsi, do you have the JIRA GERONIMO-3351 [4] fixed in
> the
> > > > RC1?
> > >
> > >
> > > GERONIMO-3351 has not been integrated into 2.0 release.  Part of the
> > > problem
> > > is addressed in branches\2.0 and trunk.  It affects only SNAPSHOT
> > > dependencies and there is some discussion on whether the downloaded
> > > version
> > > (if it is different from SNAPSHOT) should be renamed, by the plugin
> > > installer, to SNAPSHOT or the dependency resolution is Geronimo should
> > > handle it in a different way.  The problem we have run into is in
> > > conjunction with another problem that occurs when a trailing "/" is
> not
> > > present in the maven repo URL.  This has been fixed in branches\2.0
> and
> > > trunk (not in 2.0 release though) and the work around for this is to
> put
> > > that trailing "/" in the maven repo URLs in geronimo-plugin.xml
> .  These
> > > two
> > > fixes will (most likely, but not guaranteed) go into 2.0.1 due to be
> > > released soon (probably this week).
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/
> > > > [2]
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/tuscany-integration/
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integration
> > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Raymond
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > Hi
> >
> > org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. was taken out
> a
> > week or so ago when I moved the majority of sca binding into the
> > binding-sca
> > module. I'm thinking that I was a little overzealous when I took this
> out
> > and that it probably needs to go back in.  In the mean time can you
> create
> > a
> >
> >
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.impl.SCABindingFactoryImpl
> >
> > instead?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
You may very well be right. Time to push some new snapshots out! Let me find
out how to do that.

Simon

Reply via email to