Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
I've reviewed the RC and think its looks ok to release. All the legal
stuff
looks ok, most of the samples i've tried run ok. There's a few problems
already discovered and with JIRAs and there are a couple of unwanted work
folders included - samples/callback-ws-client includes work directory,
samples/helloworld-ws-reference-jms and helloworld-ws-service-jms include
activemq-data. I'll go fix that in the brn and trunk. The src distro and
various samples built ok for me, i've not tried with an empty local
repository though so i'll leave others to comment on that,
...ant
On Jan 16, 2008 12:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC2/
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/>
<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/>
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT
report,
and the Maven staging repository.
Can I ask you to choose a selection of platforms in order to test the
webapp
samples. In the RELEASE_NOTES we reference
- Tomcat 6.0.14
- Geronimo 2.0.2 Tomcat6 jee5
- WebSphere 6.1 fix pack 11
If you do find issues with the release candidate that you think need
to be fixed and lead to a -1 please review and fix them in the 1.1branch
and/or raise jira's targeting the 1.1 release.
Vote early, vote often!
Thanks,
Simon
Thanks everyone
I've put in a workaround for the build failure that works for me (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1998).
I've removed the work and activemq-data dirs in the branch that Ant pointed
out
I've made a slight notice file change
Venkat has fixed the implementation-policy integrity sample apparently
Luciano has removed the extra saxon processing that is not required and
fixed the wsdl2java build
So I think it's worth another spin. I'm not going to press the button until
first thing in the morning though so if you find other license, build or
sample issues before then please raise them
Simon
I have been investigating TUSCANY-1965. This is marked as critical but
was not targeted for SCA-Java-1.1. I understand what is causing the
problem and I have two versions of the fix:
1) A very small change to CallbackReferenceImpl that does some extra
wire cloning and resolves the problem, at the cost of greater
runtime overhead.
2) A more extensive fix to CallbackReferenceImpl, RuntimeWireImpl and
JDKCallbackInvocationHandler that combines the extra wire cloning
from fix 1) with a new cache that reuses cloned wires in many
common cases. The combined effect should be to fix the problem
with minimal or no increase in runtime overhead.
Both these fixes do not cause any problems with a top-level build.
I have checked fix 1) into the 1.1 branch under revision r613023.
It is a smaller change than fix 2) and therefore lower risk.
I have checked fix 2) into trunk under revision r613024.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
