On Jan 18, 2008 12:38 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > On Jan 17, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>+1 > >> > >>I've reviewed the RC and think its looks ok to release. All the legal > >>stuff > >>looks ok, most of the samples i've tried run ok. There's a few problems > >>already discovered and with JIRAs and there are a couple of unwanted > work > >>folders included - samples/callback-ws-client includes work directory, > >>samples/helloworld-ws-reference-jms and helloworld-ws-service-jms > include > >>activemq-data. I'll go fix that in the brn and trunk. The src distro and > >>various samples built ok for me, i've not tried with an empty local > >>repository though so i'll leave others to comment on that, > >> > >> ...ant > >> > >>On Jan 16, 2008 12:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > >>>Java. > >>> > >>>The SVN tag for the release is: > >>> > >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC2/ > >> > >>>The artifacts are available for review at: > >>>http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/> > >> > >><http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/> > >> > >>>This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT > >> > >>report, > >> > >>>and the Maven staging repository. > >>> > >>>Can I ask you to choose a selection of platforms in order to test the > >>>webapp > >>>samples. In the RELEASE_NOTES we reference > >>> > >>> - Tomcat 6.0.14 > >>> - Geronimo 2.0.2 Tomcat6 jee5 > >>> - WebSphere 6.1 fix pack 11 > >>> > >>>If you do find issues with the release candidate that you think need > >>>to be fixed and lead to a -1 please review and fix them in the > 1.1branch > >>>and/or raise jira's targeting the 1.1 release. > >>> > >>>Vote early, vote often! > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>> > >>>Simon > >>> > >> > > Thanks everyone > > > > I've put in a workaround for the build failure that works for me (see > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1998). > > I've removed the work and activemq-data dirs in the branch that Ant > pointed > > out > > I've made a slight notice file change > > Venkat has fixed the implementation-policy integrity sample apparently > > Luciano has removed the extra saxon processing that is not required and > > fixed the wsdl2java build > > > > So I think it's worth another spin. I'm not going to press the button > until > > first thing in the morning though so if you find other license, build or > > sample issues before then please raise them > > > > Simon > > > I have been investigating TUSCANY-1965. This is marked as critical but > was not targeted for SCA-Java-1.1. I understand what is causing the > problem and I have two versions of the fix: > 1) A very small change to CallbackReferenceImpl that does some extra > wire cloning and resolves the problem, at the cost of greater > runtime overhead. > 2) A more extensive fix to CallbackReferenceImpl, RuntimeWireImpl and > JDKCallbackInvocationHandler that combines the extra wire cloning > from fix 1) with a new cache that reuses cloned wires in many > common cases. The combined effect should be to fix the problem > with minimal or no increase in runtime overhead. > > Both these fixes do not cause any problems with a top-level build. > > I have checked fix 1) into the 1.1 branch under revision r613023. > It is a smaller change than fix 2) and therefore lower risk. > > I have checked fix 2) into trunk under revision r613024. > > Simon > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ok thanks everyone. I've now made a new RC so consider this VOTE thread terminated.
Simon
