Sorry Venkat, I didn't explicitly respond to your posting, but I hope the answers I gave to Sebastien's similar line of questioning makes it clear. Please let me know if not.
Kelvin. On 28/02/2008, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "This software will implement relevant open standards including, but not > limited to, the > SCA standard defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section, and related > technologies." > > > When we say "including but not limited to" I understand that it would very > well contain SDO and others implicitly. Or, does this have a different > interprettation ? > > - Venkat > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > kelvin goodson wrote: > > > Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany > > community > > > that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When > > this > > > thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions > > around > > > it, it must be clear to the wider Apache community that the Tuscany > > > community accepts that. Without this clear acceptance I fear the new > > > project will face further periods of delay whilst questions are asked > > about > > > the Tuscany communities intentions with regards to SDO Java > development. > > > > > > So the answer to your question is conditional. > > > If the new project is accepted an an incubator .... > > > > > > - does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes > > > - and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- no > > > - and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? > > --- > > > yes > > > > > > if the project is not accepted as an incubator ... > > > > > > - does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes > > > - and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- yes > > > - and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? > > --- > > > yes > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how to vote, or if I should vote, on your other > > thread. Maybe I'm missing something. There is an SDO implementation in > > Tuscany at the moment. SDO is a "related technology" worked on in > > OpenCSA too. Why would we want to remove it from the charter? > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
