Hey, that's np. Your response to Sebastien was elaborate enuf :) . Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry Venkat, I didn't explicitly respond to your posting, but I hope > the > answers I gave to Sebastien's similar line of questioning makes it clear. > Please let me know if not. > > Kelvin. > > On 28/02/2008, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > "This software will implement relevant open standards including, but not > > limited to, the > > SCA standard defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section, and related > > technologies." > > > > > > When we say "including but not limited to" I understand that it would > very > > well contain SDO and others implicitly. Or, does this have a different > > interprettation ? > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > kelvin goodson wrote: > > > > Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany > > > community > > > > that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When > > > this > > > > thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions > > > around > > > > it, it must be clear to the wider Apache community that the Tuscany > > > > community accepts that. Without this clear acceptance I fear the > new > > > > project will face further periods of delay whilst questions are > asked > > > about > > > > the Tuscany communities intentions with regards to SDO Java > > development. > > > > > > > > So the answer to your question is conditional. > > > > If the new project is accepted an an incubator .... > > > > > > > > - does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes > > > > - and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- no > > > > - and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related > technology? > > > --- > > > > yes > > > > > > > > if the project is not accepted as an incubator ... > > > > > > > > - does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes > > > > - and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- yes > > > > - and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related > technology? > > > --- > > > > yes > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how to vote, or if I should vote, on your > other > > > thread. Maybe I'm missing something. There is an SDO implementation in > > > Tuscany at the moment. SDO is a "related technology" worked on in > > > OpenCSA too. Why would we want to remove it from the charter? > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
