Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
If the SCADefinitions model must hold jms binding definitions, I guess it
must add the jms binding as a dependency.
Good news, it doesn't need to :)
This is similar to the assembly model holding JMS binding definitions
for example, without having a dependency on the JMS binding.
Or am I missing something?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
