Yes that makes clear simple sense. Really lost it, I must say. Thanks :) - Venkat
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > Hmm... seems like I am missing something then... alright let me ask you > this > > way... > > > > if SCADefintions is going to contain a list of JMSBinding definitions.. > > won't in end up something like this... > > > > public interface SCADefinitions { > > List<Intent> getPolicyIntents(); > > List<JMSBinding> getJmsBindingDefs(); > > ... > > > > } > > > > Now to get the class 'JMSBinding' mustn't the definitions module include > the > > binding-jms module as dependency ? > > > > No :) like Service lists Bindings (including JMSBindings) without a > dependency on the JMS binding module. > > You just need to define SCADefinitions as follows: > public interface SCADefinitions { > List<Intent> getPolicyIntents(); > List<Binding> getBindings(); > } > > Does this helps? > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >