That, I couldn't answer at the moment. The CMoS has always been the Bible for me, through all my university classes and work experience. I don't have copies of the other references to give a definitive answer. Maybe I'll pop down to the library tonight and research it.
Doug Fields Tampa, FL -----Original Message----- From: tvornottv@googlegroups.com [mailto:tvorno...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin M. Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:26 AM To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] OT: Bushes, Bush's, or Bushs On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Doug Fields <d...@flids.net> wrote: > From the sixteenth edition of the Chicago Manual of Style: > The correct usage would be "The Bushes are blue-bloods." Here is where I again get nit-picky -- is this the same in the AP and MLA style manuals? I only ask because I've seen more than a few instances where the Chicago Manual of Style differed greatly from the other primary manuals (its insistance on the double-s apostrophe, as in James's, for example). None of my university professors would allow the Chicago Manual to be used -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
