On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:45 PM, @siculars <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote: > @raffi @rsarver, I wrote up my two cents earlier, > http://siculars.posterous.com/twitter-monoculture. I just don't > appreciate the direction you all are going in. @raffi, I spoke with > you at the CU recruiting event a few weeks back and I got to tell you > that if I were asked I would tell those kids to reconsider working at > twitter and possibly consider a Twitter competitor. you say "building > clients is ... Thinking too small" I would say your policy change is > thinking small and alienating your ardent supporters. >
To which I would add, what is Twitter to arbitrate that which is and is not "too small?" Has Twitter subscribed to the fallacious "bigger is always better" philosophy? How small is too small? Less than $25 million in startup funds? OR One creative, fun loving person and their sweat equity? -- Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list Change your membership to this group: http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
