On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 at 14:20, Brooks Harris via tz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another subject that worries me is that the bill actually changes the > definition of time as prescribed by laws since 1918 and 1968. Doesn't this > risk confusion and legal disputes about the meaning of all timestamps? > No. It amends and repeals various parts of existing law, but that wouldn't change how those laws have been "on the books" at points in the past. While there can be certain exceptions within various contexts, non-retroactivity is pretty strong as a generally accepted principle of law. -- Tim Parenti
