On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Kumar Gala > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -#define MPC85xx_PORDEVSR2_SEC_CFG 0x00000020 >> +#define MPC85xx_PORDEVSR2_SEC_CFG 0x00000080 > > How about adding a comment that the RM is wrong? Any time the code > disagrees with the RM, it *has* to be documented.
Its documented in the commit. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot