On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Kumar Gala  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -#define MPC85xx_PORDEVSR2_SEC_CFG      0x00000020
>> +#define MPC85xx_PORDEVSR2_SEC_CFG      0x00000080
>
> How about adding a comment that the RM is wrong?   Any time the code
> disagrees with the RM, it *has* to be documented.

Its documented in the commit.

- k
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to