Hi Otavio, On 31/08/2013 23:55, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Eric Nelson > <eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> wrote: >> The primary reason this patch set is sent as an RFC is the overall >> feeling that there must be a better way and the fact that none of >> these pads is actually used by any current code in U-Boot and the >> vast majority of these changes will never do so (OBSERVABILITY >> pads, for instance). > > I think it is better to have all the pads there so we don't need to > always recheck if the pad is known or not and make changes on this all > the time. >
I am not sure I have understood your sentence: what do you mean with "there" ? Are you suggesting another place for the pads ? > This will also help in the work of TechNexion guys with the SPL; so I > am all in favor of these changes. Agree. A full cleanup is necessary before trying to push the changes we have already discussed. I tend also to prepare a new branch on u-boot-imx, where I will play the current status for the imx6 - these changes will not flow into 2013.10, and maybe having a branch to test will help. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot