On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Eric Nelson <eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> wrote: > On 09/01/2013 11:21 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: ... > Shawn appears to have implemented things in a clean way > for the main-line kernel: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-pinfunc.h?id=c56009b2f6134e5943a03cf26e4d7fce9745d56b > > I recommend that we simply adopt the main-line kernel naming, > and work up a couple of initial patches: > > 1. simply replace all of the names with their main-line > equivalent, and > 2. remove all of the unused (NO_PAD_I,NO_MUX_I) pad > declarations > > Each of these should be easy to inspect for correctness > and then we can focus on how to handle the differences > and produce binaries that support both variants. > > Let me know your thoughts. ...
I fully support this idea; this easy: * comparing code against Linux kernel; * backporting code from Linux kernel; * correctness (as we don't need to change it every time we add something "new"); * avoid continuous inspection of this during U-Boot work (often we need to double check the pins are known and which name has been used); Regards, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot