Hi, On 24 May 2014 20:15, Harsha Kiran <harshakiran...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon. > I am able to successfully load the FIT image now :) Thanks for the help. > > I applied Heiko's patch. If CONFIG_OF_CONTROL is defined, the behaviour of > the board is same as i mentioned in my previous emails. I tried removing the > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL from the config file and it was able to read the > u-boot.img. I modifed my uEnv.txt file and i was able to load my FIT image. > > I was wondering if we use CONFIG_OF_SEPERATE and CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE > is it fine not to use the CONFIG_OF_CONTROL? and how should i use the > u-boot-dtb.bin file? I tried stopping the u-boot and entered the following > in the u-boot prompt to load the u-boot-dtb.bin > > u-boot# fatload mmc 0 0x81000000 u-boot-dtb.bin > > U-Boot# > U-Boot# > U-Boot# fatload mmc 0 0x81000000 u-boot-dtb.bin > reading u-boot-dtb.bin > 460759 bytes read in 43 ms (10.2 MiB/s) > U-Boot# go 0x81000000 > ## Starting application at 0x81000000 ... > > > U-Boot 2014.07-rc1 (May 25 2014 - 00:46:36) > > I2C: ready > DRAM: 1 GiB > > and it hangs here.. Which address should i use to load the u-boot-dtb.bin?
Check that you disabled the cache with 'dcache off' before the 'go' command (if the cache was enabled). I'm not sure what the address should be, but given that it gets that far, it is probably fine. As a rule of thumb, load it low in memory - it will relocate to high in memory. > > I will start working on the secure u-boot with FIT signatures soon on > am335xsk EVM. OK. I will break out my Beaglebone also, perhaps this week. I really want to get these patches applied so it works smoothly on TI platforms. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
