Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca99373.7020...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > Patch 1 will change the #if and introduce CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY > > instead. > > > > Patch 2 will fix at91/clock.c+timer.c > > Maybe there is a misunderstanding here. I see three patches > > 1. introduce CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY to common.h > > 2. add an #ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY to global_data.h with the > required variables > > 3. change clock and timer. > > 2+3 combined in one patch? OK
No. 1 + 2 belong together; they deal with the same topic and should be applied as a single commit. 3 is a completely different story and goes in a separate patch. > And I bet, this must be a patch series ;) Not necessarily. The 1+2 combo is independent from 3 (but needed as a prerequisite, so posting this in a series is fine as well). Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes. -- Edith Keeler, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate unknown _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot