Hi Heiko,
Thanks for checking.

On Mon Aug 24, 2026 at 4:21 PM CST, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Yao Zi, Junhui Liu,
>
> On 18.08.26 08:53, Yao Zi wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 11:40:20AM +0800, Junhui Liu wrote:
>>> Fix two issues in the SpacemiT K1 I2C driver and clock provider.
>>>
>>> The first issue is that the controller bus mode is selected using the
>>> functional clock rate instead of the requested I2C bus speed from the
>>> device tree.
>>>
>>> The second issue is that the TWSI functional clocks incorrectly include
>>> the bus clock enable bit in their gate masks. As a result the I2C driver
>>> can operate with only the functional clock enabled, which diverges from
>>> the device tree description and the Linux driver (both expect separate
>>> "func" and "bus" clocks).
>>>
>>> To fix the second issue without breaking intermediate states, the
>>> patches are ordered as follows:
>>>
>>> - First add the missing bus clocks (and their parent chain) to the SPL
>>>    clock tree.
>>> - Then update the I2C driver to acquire and enable both the functional
>>>    and bus clocks by name.
>>> - Finally remove the bus gate bit from the functional clock definitions
>>>    (except TWSI8, whose write-only register requires the combined gate).
>> 
>> Personally I think it's okay to break booting in this case as long as
>> you explicitly point it out. Merging the conceptually related PATCH 2
>> and PATCH 4 which together fix description of TWSI controller clocks
>> would make the commit description shorter and clearer. But it depends on
>> you.
>
> For me the series is okay now, if you (Junhui Liu) have not prepared a
> v3 with the merge Yao Zi explained already ... I will pick v2 up for next...
>
> Please give me feedback, what you plan, thanks!

I don't plan to send a v3. I think the current structure and patch
ordering in v2 are fine, so please feel free to pick it up.

Thanks to you and Yao Zi for the review.

>
>> For the whole series,
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Yao Zi <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks!
>
> bye,
> Heiko
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Yao Zi
>> 

-- 
Best regards,
Junhui Liu

Reply via email to