If they were in your path before, everything would have worked. Dependencies have been known to drive programmers crazy. They used to call it dll-hell.
-----Original Message----- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of charles_shaf...@ntn-bower.com Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:26 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library OK. Turned out to be a really easy fix. I added the two DLLs to the dependency table while making the deployment package. Seems obvious now, except I swear they were never there before. This app has been in use for years and I have modified it a dozen times. This never came up before. I think I'll go home now and get my sanity back by watching a David Lynch movie. Thanks to everyone. >When loading a dependent dll, the loader also tries to load all statically linked dependent dlls of the dependent dll. What could be >happening is that either the unioledb.dll or uniobjects.dll that you are linking to is a different version, and expects to link to a >different unirpc32.dll. If you have visual studio 6, there is a tool called depends.exe which shows a list of the dependencies as a >tree view. You could load your dll and see what the problem is. And you are right, you want to start with your dll. Good luck! Charles Shaffer Senior Analyst NTN-Bower Corporation _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
