I do the same as Ben but with .NET:
-- Local U2 <> .NET client <web service> Remote server

Pick is a database server, not a communications protocol end-point. We
simply should not be doing direct comms from this platform anymore,
given the huge number of mainstream options. This is coming from
someone who has written all of the bi-directional comms interfaces
to/from MV with sockets and cURL and plugins and anything else I could
create - because (in the 90's) people said it wasn't possible and
because I figured it would be kewl just to do it.

It _is_ all technically possible, but that doesn't mean it makes good
business sense: Doing things like this in BASIC creates a maintenance
hassle later. It leaves the environment subject to DBMS-specific
issues that often aren't addressed for quite a long time. Using
mainstream tools vastly increases the resources available for getting
help and solving problems.

So these days I get MV to push a query or data payload out to a
middle-tier that uses the latest communications methods available.
The request goes out, the response comes back, it all just works -
that That should be our bottom line here.

HTH
T

> From: Ben Souther 
> We use a middle layer written in Java.

> Jeff Schasny wrote:
> > I know we have both the SOAP and RESTful web services development
for
> > publishing web services from Universe but how are folks consuming
> > other peoples web services into the database? Are there tools for
this
> > or am I going to just open a socket, read, and parse 'till I'm
blue in the face?


_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to