Haha..yes. We should do that. 2008/11/4 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why not get Ubiquity on addons.mozilla.com in the first place? > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Abimanyu Raja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Yep, the social aspects like on addons.mozilla.com should also be part of >> The Herd, imo. >> >> I agree with Gary. That's why I wanted to include improving performance as >> a major goal. Specifically, the tickets he mentioned, adding back old >> features and replacing the annotation service. Regarding planning for 0.2, I >> think it's just about setting the long term goals. In the end, they have to >> be broken to smaller milestones as Aza said. So, I think that performance >> issues, a goal for 0.2, should probably be the focus for 0.1.4 (assuming >> 0.1.3 is focused on skinning). Or we should swap the focuses. 0.1.3 should >> be for performance issues. I would really like the context menu and >> noun-first suggestions back. And of course, we should really try not to >> break people's current behavior (esp. noun-first suggestions). >> >> I feel like we need to delegate work (at least for a few key issues) to >> make faster progress. >> >> - Abi >> >> 2008/11/4 Gary Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Hi guys, >>> >>> Whilst some of the goals for 0.2 sound fun, in my opinion there are some >>> fundamentals that perhaps should be addressed beforehand. For example, >>> reintroducing functionality that was lost with 0.1.2 (e.g. tickets #358, >>> #359 & #394 are some I raised about this :-), stabilising the codebase, and >>> addressing performance. Something else that really needs addressing is the >>> trust-network and the way commands are subscribed to. I've read a few blog >>> posts, and received a couple of emails, saying that the major factor that is >>> stopping people from adopting Ubiquity is the security risk of subscribing >>> to new commands. >>> >>> Perhaps these are planned for a prior release, but considering 0.1.2 was >>> about 6 weeks late, and 0.1.3 still has 28 active tickets, planning 0.2 for >>> the end of 2008 seems a little over-ambitious. I don't want to rain on the >>> parade - I love hacking away at new stuff with the best of them - but >>> without some core stability I think the user base will lose interest and >>> we'll be left with an interesting toy for a handful of people, but no >>> wide-spread adoption. >>> >>> Of course this is only my take on things, and perhaps not seeing the >>> bigger picture :-) I hope these comments are taken in a positive way. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Fernando Takai <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, but herd needs to be improved. For example, we need to add social >>>> features like rating, commenting -- and we need to have a place to host >>>> commands, like gist, but ours. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Fernando Takai < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ubiquity planet is like an addon.firefox.com for commands (if im not >>>>>> mistaken). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wouldn't that be the Herd? >>>>> >>>>> Typically planets are just aggregators for specific communities of >>>>> interest [1] -- so of people that often blog about Ubiquity, it's just one >>>>> central place that pulls in those posts. Unless you mean something else, >>>>> Aza? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_(software)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_%28software%29> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fernando "Takai" >>>> http://flickr.com/photos/supeertakai >>>> http://fernandotakai.wordpress.com >>>> http://fernandotakai.jaiku.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Mayuresh > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
