That’s good news and interesting PTMP approach.
We may install a second link close bay and I’m not sure if using PTMP could
make some issue in that case.
From: Mark Steckel
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 6:46 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Cc: Ubnt users
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with PoweBeam AC ISO
I have a 2130 ft link using a pair of PBE-5AC-300-ISOs and 30 MHz-wide channel
in U-NII 1 working great. Consistently provides 200 Mbps or a bit more.
Based on a few posts on the Ubnt forums, I tried and ended up with better
results configuring the radios as PTMP instead of PTP.
Cheers
Mark
----- On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Eduardo eme...@webjogger.com wrote:
> Hi guys,
> We need a link with at least 120M to join two buildings that are 2,200 ft.
> from
> each other. Thinking in use the PowerBeam AC ISO that suppose to do 450Mbps.
> I know that the new regulations on the 5GHz have some restrictions on the
> power
> of the radios that affect the throughput of the link. Trying to understand
> those limitations, but really I could get it totally and wondering if someone
> has a real life experience that can say which of the U-NII (1, 2A, or 2C)
> frequency will work in this scenario and which channel width thinking on 20,30
> or 40MHz. This is a place with a big interference in the 5725-5850 MHz
> spectrum.
> Any suggestion is much appreciate.
> Thanks,
> Eduardo Mejia
> [ http://www.webjogger.net/ | www.Webjogger.net ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
