----- On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Eduardo eme...@webjogger.com wrote:
> That’s good news and interesting PTMP approach. > We may install a second link close bay and I’m not sure if using PTMP could > make > some issue in that case. Ubnt has spent most of their recent effort on the PTMP functionality of the AC firmware. So at the moment the PTMP performance and stability is generally better than the PTP functionality. If you are choosing a frequency in U-NII 1 or Un-NII 2 to avoid congestion in U-NII 3, the mode (PTMP or PTP) of the radios should have no impact. My (limited) understanding is that the differences in PTMP vs PTP mode are about timing, frames, and related. Otherwise, frequency use is frequency use. > From: [ mailto:m...@fix.net | Mark Steckel ] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 6:46 PM > To: [ mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org | Ubiquiti Users Group ] > Cc: [ mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org | Ubnt users ] > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with PoweBeam AC ISO > I have a 2130 ft link using a pair of PBE-5AC-300-ISOs and 30 MHz-wide channel > in U-NII 1 working great. Consistently provides 200 Mbps or a bit more. > > Based on a few posts on the Ubnt forums, I tried and ended up with better > results configuring the radios as PTMP instead of PTP. > > Cheers > Mark > > > ----- On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Eduardo eme...@webjogger.com wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> We need a link with at least 120M to join two buildings that are 2,200 ft. >> from >> each other. Thinking in use the PowerBeam AC ISO that suppose to do 450Mbps. >> I know that the new regulations on the 5GHz have some restrictions on the >> power >> of the radios that affect the throughput of the link. Trying to understand >> those limitations, but really I could get it totally and wondering if someone >> has a real life experience that can say which of the U-NII (1, 2A, or 2C) >> frequency will work in this scenario and which channel width thinking on >> 20,30 >> or 40MHz. This is a place with a big interference in the 5725-5850 MHz >> spectrum. >> Any suggestion is much appreciate. >> Thanks, >> Eduardo Mejia >> [ http://www.webjogger.net/ | www.Webjogger.net ] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
