Sarah Hobbs wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > You know, it's mails like this that make me really feel that it's not > worth triaging bugs, or aiming for a reasonably decent QA. > > It's when you start dealing with ~1000 bugs over a few source packages > that this kind of stuff gets interesting. Yes, one bug would be easy > enough. 1000? Now that takes a while.
Right, let's keep in perspective that the aim of Ubuntu QA is to improve the quality of the distro. At the end of the day it's about the code we compile and CDs we provide to our users. Taking feedback through bug reports is one of our most important tools in that pursuit, but it's just that: one of our tools. Triaging all bugs perfectly so that no useful information is ever lost and everyone feels happy at every step is not necessarily the most efficient path towards the general goal. We should try our best to identify the real serious issues, those affecting many users and generally improve as many of the smaller issues as we can, but there will always be trade-offs. Henrik -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
