On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Brian Murray <br...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Bug reporting does not "require[s] a form of social network" as the bug
> was properly reported without one. Rather to move the bug along the
> triaging process usually requires other people to look at it and
> indicate whether or not they also experience the bug.
Well, yes! I can see that clearly now by this perfect example here[1]
on your launchpad, and how fine grained Canonical's tactics work out,
if (!) you dont run into a super (ninja) troll like me.
At first a person who seems like the cute and warmhearted animal
friend ("thank you for making Ubuntu better by reporting a bug"). Then
the classic developer guy who tries to tell me at first the problem
does not exist. Only as I raise the tone he confirmes the problem.
Then we have this mysterious guy from Portugal who feels the political
dimension of the problem. He will try to defend the case in a heroic
fashion. And when you believe that you finally made it and the problem
is properly discussed amoung those guys who matter, the Canonical dude
shows up and wipes it all out with a quicky: this is only desire and
not a bug, classified "invalid". *BANG*
Guys, please forget about this bug reportig thing. Its only good for
comedy. We all better go and write our own blog.
Have a nice day!
Patrick (the ninja troll) Freundt
[1]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500601
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
